<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holy Carp! Part II</title>
	<link>http://www.brandonhays.com/podfitness/userblog/?p=12</link>
	<description>Unofficial, unauthorized access to the self-proclaimed geniuses at Podfitness</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Schwieb &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Whistle while you work</title>
		<link>http://www.brandonhays.com/podfitness/userblog/?p=12#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brandonhays.com/podfitness/userblog/?p=12#comment-3</guid>
					<description>[...] Anyway, as far as work goes, MacWorld was pretty good this year. I met a number of interesting folks in the Microsoft Blogger Lounge and answered a ton of questions over at the main Microsoft booth. Apparently I&#8217;m a &#8220;docile developer&#8221; &#8212; I&#8217;m glad that Brandon liked the personal tech support. On Tuesday evening I got to chat with Jacqui Cheng of Ars Technica at the Microsoft Press Party. Apparently Jade had wandered off to someother event so I didn&#8217;t get to experience the full snark effect, but Jacqui and her friend Herschell (sp?) were quite pleasant to talk to. I&#8217;ve been following a few threads on the Ars Macintosh forum, where a few commenters insist on dragging the MacBU through the mud as often as they can (and you can see a few of their comments on some of my other posts here). Somehow Jacqui and I got to talking about the perceptions you get as you scan people&#8217;s comments. So many of them are negative that it is easy to get kinda down about blogging. I mean, who really wants to share some personal insights only to get cursed out all the time? It&#8217;s a little odd, but most of the positive comments I get are sent to me in private email, whereas the people who have some issue or complaint about me or the MacBU usually post public comments (dare I call them diatribes, at times?). Jacqui said she&#8217;s noted the same thing with her columns on Ars. I wonder why that is? Are there any human behaviorists reading this who care to hazard a guess? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Anyway, as far as work goes, MacWorld was pretty good this year. I met a number of interesting folks in the Microsoft Blogger Lounge and answered a ton of questions over at the main Microsoft booth. Apparently I&#8217;m a &#8220;docile developer&#8221; &#8212; I&#8217;m glad that Brandon liked the personal tech support. On Tuesday evening I got to chat with Jacqui Cheng of Ars Technica at the Microsoft Press Party. Apparently Jade had wandered off to someother event so I didn&#8217;t get to experience the full snark effect, but Jacqui and her friend Herschell (sp?) were quite pleasant to talk to. I&#8217;ve been following a few threads on the Ars Macintosh forum, where a few commenters insist on dragging the MacBU through the mud as often as they can (and you can see a few of their comments on some of my other posts here). Somehow Jacqui and I got to talking about the perceptions you get as you scan people&#8217;s comments. So many of them are negative that it is easy to get kinda down about blogging. I mean, who really wants to share some personal insights only to get cursed out all the time? It&#8217;s a little odd, but most of the positive comments I get are sent to me in private email, whereas the people who have some issue or complaint about me or the MacBU usually post public comments (dare I call them diatribes, at times?). Jacqui said she&#8217;s noted the same thing with her columns on Ars. I wonder why that is? Are there any human behaviorists reading this who care to hazard a guess? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
